Hansi.Bierdo
black satanic glamour
- Registriert
- 18 November 2007
- Beiträge
- 9.640
- Reaktionspunkte
- 1.416
Ich denke mal die USADA weiß besser Bescheid, was im World Anit-Doping Code und in den "anwendbaren Gesetzen" steht.
Du willst es nicht verstehen. Das Machtspielchen läuft doch schon eine ganze Zeit. Beschließen und verkünden kann man viel, besonders als US-Agentur, aber Tygart sprach doch selber davon, dass die UCI ihren Sanktionen folge _müsse_. Die UCI will jetzt erstmal eine Erklärung gemäß WADC 8.3.
"The UCI notes Lance Armstrong's decision not to proceed to arbitration in the case that USADA has brought against him.
The UCI recognizes that USADA is reported as saying that it will strip Mr. Armstrong of all results from 1998 onwards in addition to imposing a lifetime ban from participating in any sport which recognizes the World Anti-Doping Code.
Article 8.3 of the WADC states that where no hearing occurs the Anti-Doping Organization with results management responsibility shall submit to the parties concerned (Mr. Armstrong, WADA and UCI) a reasoned decision explaining the action taken.
As USADA has claimed jurisdiction in the case the UCI expects that it will issue a reasoned decision in accordance with Article 8.3 of the Code.
Until such time as USADA delivers this decision the UCI has no further comment to make."